(English → Español) View originalTranslators:
After the commotion surrounding the passage of Arizona’s SB-1070 and the success by grassroots and civil rights organizations to enjoin the legislation from taking its full effect, we are still seeing the spread of “SB-1070”-type legislation all over the country. Point in case: Alabama. A couple days ago Alabama passed, what an NYT editorial called: “The Nation’s Cruelest Immigration Law.”bm6fimjo9xa80jntn75uwj7ihqlakfmw
It is a sweeping attempt to terrorize undocumented immigrants in every aspect of their lives, and to make potential criminals of anyone who may work or live with them or show them kindness.0sc2qfqx88kq23xq1dix0yvhpx5cfro8
It effectively makes it a crime to be an undocumented immigrant in Alabama, by criminalizing working, renting a home and failing to comply with federal registration laws that are largely obsolete. It nullifies any contracts when one party is an undocumented immigrant. It requires the police to check the papers of people they suspect to be here illegally.7nc6dnpeowluamkyoejjy8xbkw0yf01a
The new regime does not spare American citizens. Businesses that knowingly employ illegal immigrants will lose their licenses. Public school officials will be required to determine students’ immigration status and report back to the state. tp4puv0oh9z5obwn765j5p5p28hrz0xmAnyone knowingly “concealing, harboring or shielding” an illegal immigrant could be charged with a crime, say for renting someone an apartment or driving her to church or the doctor.
…..
These arguments have been made before, in opposition to similar, if less sweeping, laws passed in Arizona, Utah, Indiana and Georgia. xgksquz3j4cjydy7sl187uxhjt6n5fzlWhat is remarkable in Alabama is the separate lawsuit by the four church leaders, who say the law violates their religious freedoms to perform acts of charity without regard to the immigration status of those they minister to or help.o4bwz3gp6xeue8d6l0aav8wb29etwnlh
For the full article go to NYTimes. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/29/opinion/the-nations-cruelest-immigration-law.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss. Published Aug. 28, 2011.z7c4ooe0llv8ouy6f4ciajqj7u8ny41l
While I understand that the immigration issue is practically a never-ending debate, ultimately I thought this rage against immigrants would eventually die down or manifests itself in different ways. For the record, debate would be an inaccurate term to describe such discussions because it would insinuate that reason-based discussion takes place…instead the immigration topic usually involves the use of fear tactics, racial slurs, reliance on incomplete studies, etc. 82vqc7hq6ydxqqhylxgokibr9v0c6f8cEither way, the fact that Alabama’s bill is worst than Arizona’s gives me the chills.ax6b786kz3xu3bu7mv271a6hb624nnd5
Luckily, it was announced that the bill was enjoined by a federal judge giving opponents to the bill an opportunity to argue why the bill as a whole, or parts of the bill, are unconstitutional. This is not a clear victory for immigrants, their families and our communities at-large, it is only a wake-up call for the rest of the nation that we need to mobilize y pronto!nz6f026f5krwyq5fhxvg9kqavfuqwywt
A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a tough immigration law in Alabama on Monday.
Opponents of the measure — including state church leaders, the U.S. Justice Department and the American Civil Liberties Union– had asked U.S. j29wtizutj72l7fjqy54jpww0nzcf7rqJudge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn to stop the law, which was scheduled to go into effect Thursday.
State officials argue the law would help Alabama and not violate civil rights.
In her two-page order, the judge said there was not enough time before Thursday to address all the legal arguments from various parties over the law’s constitutionality. gmuvk7djbxav0qky8sws72ztgeevrfyl“It is hereby ordered that Act 2011-535 is temporarily enjoined, and may not be executed or enforced,” wrote Blackburn.
The Alabama law requires that police “attempt to determine the immigration status of a person who they suspect is an unauthorized alien of this country,” according to an Alabama House of Representatives fact sheet. msmnmh7n1hosi9tng36ew9vgy5df6yocThat provision is similar to other laws aiming to crack down on illegal immigration passed by other state legislatures over the past year.
But the Alabama law also includes more expansive measures, including requiring the state to check immigration status of students in public schools.
Blackburn made clear her order does not reflect on the merits of either side’s legal arguments. ptnfhe42sxczovuayecdaju1ny6yuhoaShe ordered both the state and the law’s opponents to file further legal briefs in the case, and said her injunction will remain in place at least until September 29. Further appeals to higher federal courts could prevent the law from going into effect for months, even years.
…..
Bentley signed the law in June.
“Gov. Bentley campaigned on the need for a strong immigration bill,” the governor’s spokeswoman, Rebekah Mason, said last month.
Republican Alabama state Rep. 6zs78c01tk0u1fuxu82gorb1xxrmk6dmJohn Merrill told CNN in June that the legislation would be “good for Alabama” because it would reduce illegal immigration to the state and “provide equal opportunities for all people who want to come to Alabama legally.”
ACLU attorney Andre Segura noted that the length of Wednesday’s hearing showed the complexity of Alabama’s law compared with other state measures.
….
Alabama’s law is considered the strictest in the nation. 9jcs1tzqznklzhvm6so2j3o32mmij394Key portions of Arizona’s immigration reform law have also been blocked while a federal appeals court and the U.S. Supreme Court consider various challenges.
The Alabama case is Hispanic Interest Coalition v. Alabama (cv-2484).rx8y02ielvqrisax524fp2tk0g5bztaf
For full article go to: CNN http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/08/29/alabama.immigration.law/ Published Aug. 29, 2011.v00az74ou0gim44iq57gbh41m35idiyf
3zk0gzhlao1uml4a1byg59mcngnn7z88g0hqjxouhq6eiijarc6kogdg9ajxd8se
3zk0gzhlao1uml4a1byg59mcngnn7z88g0hqjxouhq6eiijarc6kogdg9ajxd8se
(original) View Español translation
After the commotion surrounding the passage of Arizona’s SB-1070 and the success by grassroots and civil rights organizations to enjoin the legislation from taking its full effect, we are still seeing the spread of “SB-1070”-type legislation all over the country. Point in case: Alabama. A couple days ago Alabama passed, what an NYT editorial called: “The Nation’s Cruelest Immigration Law.”
It is a sweeping attempt to terrorize undocumented immigrants in every aspect of their lives, and to make potential criminals of anyone who may work or live with them or show them kindness.
It effectively makes it a crime to be an undocumented immigrant in Alabama, by criminalizing working, renting a home and failing to comply with federal registration laws that are largely obsolete. It nullifies any contracts when one party is an undocumented immigrant. It requires the police to check the papers of people they suspect to be here illegally.
The new regime does not spare American citizens. Businesses that knowingly employ illegal immigrants will lose their licenses. Public school officials will be required to determine students’ immigration status and report back to the state. Anyone knowingly “concealing, harboring or shielding” an illegal immigrant could be charged with a crime, say for renting someone an apartment or driving her to church or the doctor.
…..
These arguments have been made before, in opposition to similar, if less sweeping, laws passed in Arizona, Utah, Indiana and Georgia. What is remarkable in Alabama is the separate lawsuit by the four church leaders, who say the law violates their religious freedoms to perform acts of charity without regard to the immigration status of those they minister to or help.
For the full article go to NYTimes. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/29/opinion/the-nations-cruelest-immigration-law.html?partner=rssnyt&emc=rss. Published Aug. 28, 2011.
While I understand that the immigration issue is practically a never-ending debate, ultimately I thought this rage against immigrants would eventually die down or manifests itself in different ways. For the record, debate would be an inaccurate term to describe such discussions because it would insinuate that reason-based discussion takes place…instead the immigration topic usually involves the use of fear tactics, racial slurs, reliance on incomplete studies, etc. Either way, the fact that Alabama’s bill is worst than Arizona’s gives me the chills.
Luckily, it was announced that the bill was enjoined by a federal judge giving opponents to the bill an opportunity to argue why the bill as a whole, or parts of the bill, are unconstitutional. This is not a clear victory for immigrants, their families and our communities at-large, it is only a wake-up call for the rest of the nation that we need to mobilize y pronto!
A federal judge temporarily blocked enforcement of a tough immigration law in Alabama on Monday.
Opponents of the measure — including state church leaders, the U.S. Justice Department and the American Civil Liberties Union– had asked U.S. Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn to stop the law, which was scheduled to go into effect Thursday.
State officials argue the law would help Alabama and not violate civil rights.
In her two-page order, the judge said there was not enough time before Thursday to address all the legal arguments from various parties over the law’s constitutionality. “It is hereby ordered that Act 2011-535 is temporarily enjoined, and may not be executed or enforced,” wrote Blackburn.
The Alabama law requires that police “attempt to determine the immigration status of a person who they suspect is an unauthorized alien of this country,” according to an Alabama House of Representatives fact sheet. That provision is similar to other laws aiming to crack down on illegal immigration passed by other state legislatures over the past year.
But the Alabama law also includes more expansive measures, including requiring the state to check immigration status of students in public schools.
Blackburn made clear her order does not reflect on the merits of either side’s legal arguments. She ordered both the state and the law’s opponents to file further legal briefs in the case, and said her injunction will remain in place at least until September 29. Further appeals to higher federal courts could prevent the law from going into effect for months, even years.
…..
Bentley signed the law in June.
“Gov. Bentley campaigned on the need for a strong immigration bill,” the governor’s spokeswoman, Rebekah Mason, said last month.
Republican Alabama state Rep. John Merrill told CNN in June that the legislation would be “good for Alabama” because it would reduce illegal immigration to the state and “provide equal opportunities for all people who want to come to Alabama legally.”
ACLU attorney Andre Segura noted that the length of Wednesday’s hearing showed the complexity of Alabama’s law compared with other state measures.
….
Alabama’s law is considered the strictest in the nation. Key portions of Arizona’s immigration reform law have also been blocked while a federal appeals court and the U.S. Supreme Court consider various challenges.
The Alabama case is Hispanic Interest Coalition v. Alabama (cv-2484).
For full article go to: CNN http://www.cnn.com/2011/US/08/29/alabama.immigration.law/ Published Aug. 29, 2011.